Showing harshness in a situation
In introduces the field or activity.
Both ruthless in and ruthless with are correct, but they express different relationships.
Ruthless in describes the area or activity where someone shows ruthlessness. Ruthless with refers to the people or things treated harshly.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
In introduces the field or activity.
With introduces the target of the behaviour.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Use in for fields or situations.
✕ ruthless with negotiations ✓ ruthless in negotiationsUse with when naming the people affected.
✕ ruthless in employees ✓ ruthless with employeesChoose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. The choice depends on meaning.
Usually an activity, field, or situation.
Usually people, teams, or things receiving harsh treatment.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.