Talking about poor skill
Awful at means very bad at doing something.
Awful at is common for lack of skill. Awful for describes bad effects. Awful in can work when referring to a situation or environment.
Use awful at for poor ability, awful for for harmful effects or suitability, and awful in when describing behaviour or conditions in a particular context.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Awful at means very bad at doing something.
Awful for means damaging or unsuitable.
Awful in can describe conduct or quality within a setting.
Awful with often refers to dealing badly with people or things.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
At is normally used for skills and performance.
✕ He is awful for tennis. ✓ He is awful at tennis.For is used when something has a bad effect.
✕ This diet is awful at children. ✓ This diet is awful for children.Awful in usually needs a clear setting or activity.
✕ She is awful in. ✓ She is awful in group discussions.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. It is commonly used for skills, games, subjects, and activities.
It means harmful, unsuitable, or damaging.
It is less common than awful at, but it is natural when talking about a specific situation or environment.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.