Describing rich supply or presence
Use abundant in for qualities, resources, species, or substances that exist in large amounts.
Abundant is most commonly followed by in or with. Other combinations are limited, rare, or depend on a different sentence structure.
Use abundant in to describe something full of a substance, quality, or feature. Use abundant with for things filled with visible objects or living things. Abundant of is nonstandard in modern English. On and for are usually separate adjuncts rather than complements of abundant.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use abundant in for qualities, resources, species, or substances that exist in large amounts.
Use abundant with for places or objects crowded or covered with things, especially plants or animals.
For can appear after abundant as part of a larger structure about purpose or need, not as the direct complement of abundant.
On usually introduces a surface, platform, or date connected to the sentence, not a complement selected by abundant.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Modern English does not normally use of after abundant.
✕ The island is abundant of coral reefs. ✓ The island is abundant in coral reefs.In is more natural for qualities and resources; with is often used for visible objects or living things.
✕ The water is abundant with minerals. ✓ The water is abundant in minerals.On usually expresses place, not a required preposition after abundant.
✕ The region is abundant on resources. ✓ The region is abundant in resources.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. Abundant in is the usual choice for resources, qualities, and substances.
Yes. Abundant with is natural for places filled with visible living things such as flowers, birds, or fish.
No. Modern standard English uses abundant in or abundant with instead.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.