Comparing one thing with another
Use to after disproportionate when saying that something is too large, small, important, or severe compared with something else.
The standard pattern is disproportionate to when comparing size, amount, importance, or effect. Other prepositions usually belong to separate phrases rather than the adjective itself.
Use disproportionate to when one thing is not in the right proportion compared with another. Phrases with in, with, as, or at are usually separate parts of the sentence, not fixed combinations with the adjective.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use to after disproportionate when saying that something is too large, small, important, or severe compared with something else.
In can introduce the area or field where something is disproportionate, but it is not selected directly by the adjective.
With is uncommon after disproportionate. It may appear when with introduces an accompanying feature rather than completing the adjective.
At usually introduces a level, age, rate, or stage. It is not the normal complement after disproportionate.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
After disproportionate, use to for comparisons.
✕ The penalty was disproportionate as the offence. ✓ The penalty was disproportionate to the offence.With is not the normal preposition for unequal proportion.
✕ The costs are disproportionate with the benefits. ✓ The costs are disproportionate to the benefits.In can describe where an imbalance exists, but not the compared item.
✕ The reaction was disproportionate in the situation. ✓ The reaction was disproportionate to the situation.Disproportionate often needs a comparison point.
✓ The response was disproportionate to the threat.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. It is the normal and widely accepted construction for comparing unequal size, effect, or importance.
Usually no for ordinary comparison. With may appear in special contexts where it introduces an accompanying feature rather than completing the adjective.
In often introduces a place, field, or context where an imbalance exists. It is not the main comparison pattern.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.