Both 'devastating to' and 'devastating for' are used in English, but they often express slightly different relationships.
'Devastating to' commonly describes emotional impact on a person. 'Devastating for' is often used for negative effects on situations, groups, or outcomes. Both can sometimes overlap.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use 'to' when something causes deep emotional pain or shock to a person.
Use 'for' when discussing harmful effects on conditions, industries, plans, or groups.
'To' can also introduce morale, confidence, reputation, or relationships.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Both 'to' and 'for' are used, but the focus may differ slightly.
✓ The news was devastating to her. / The cuts were devastating for the industry.The sentence is clearer when the affected person or thing is stated.
✕ The announcement was devastating. ✓ The announcement was devastating to staff morale.'For' often sounds more natural with industries, economies, and situations.
✕ The recession was devastating to tourism businesses. ✓ The recession was devastating for tourism businesses.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. The choice depends on whether you emphasise emotional impact or broader consequences.
'Devastating to someone' is especially common when describing emotional reactions.
Yes. It often highlights the negative consequences for that person rather than their emotional state alone.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.
