Common mistake Possible agreement error 'there was' + plural noun

Common Grammar Mistake: Agreement Errors with Plural Nouns

Grammar forms the backbone of any language, and English is no exception. However, even the most fluent English speakers can fall into common grammar pitfalls. One such mistake involves agreement errors with plural nouns. In this article, we will explore this error in detail and provide examples to help you avoid making this mistake.

Understanding Agreement Errors

Agreement errors occur when there is a mismatch between the subject and verb in a sentence. In English, verbs must agree with their subjects in terms of number (singular or plural).

For example, let's consider the sentence: "There was three books on the table."

In this case, the subject is "three books," a plural noun. However, the verb, "was," is in the singular form. The correct sentence should be: "There were three books on the table."

Avoiding Agreement Errors

To avoid agreement errors, it is crucial to identify the correct form of the verb that corresponds to the subject's number. Here are a few tips to help you avoid this common mistake:

  • Identify the subject and determine if it is singular or plural.
  • Ensure that the verb agrees with the subject in terms of number.
  • Remember that singular subjects typically take singular verbs, while plural subjects take plural verbs.

Additional Examples

Here are a few more examples to highlight agreement errors and their corrected forms:

  • Incorrect: "There was many cars parked outside."
  • Correct: "There were many cars parked outside."
  • Incorrect: "One of my friends is coming to the party."
  • Correct: "One of my friends are coming to the party."

By paying close attention to subject-verb agreement, you can avoid common grammar mistakes and ensure that your writing is clear and error-free.

(Linguix grammar checker is an excellent tool that can help you further enhance your writing by identifying and correcting various grammar errors.)

Possible agreement error 'there was' + plural noun mistake examples

  • Incorrect:
    For more than one year there was updates daily.

    Correct:
    For more than one year there were updates daily.

  • Incorrect:
    There was discussions about the money that I owe.

    Correct:
    There were discussions about the money that I owe.

  • Incorrect:
    There was grounds for his dismissal.

    Correct:
    There were grounds for his dismissal.

  • Incorrect:
    There was communications department handling the affair.

    Correct:
    There were communications department handling the affair.

  • Incorrect:
    For more than one year there was updates every day.

    Correct:
    For more than one year there were updates every day.

  • Correct:
    For more than one year there were updates to the software.
  • Incorrect:
    For almost one year there was no updates to the software.

    Correct:
    For almost one year there were no updates to the software.

  • Incorrect:
    There was some discussions about the money that I owe.

    Correct:
    There were some discussions about the money that I owe.

  • Incorrect:
    There was no grounds for his dismissal.

    Correct:
    There were no grounds for his dismissal.

  • Correct:
    For almost one year there were no updates to the software.
  • Correct:
    There was no communications department handling the affair.
  • Correct:
    To prove that there was no theatrics involved, he sent a picture.
  • Correct:
    There was a children's party.
Linguix Browser extension
Fix your writing
on millions of websites
Linguix pencil
This website uses cookies to make Linguix work for you. By using this site, you agree to our cookie policy