Common mistake food born vs foodborne

Food Born vs Foodborne

One common mistake that people make in writing is confusing the terms "food born" and "foodborne." While they may sound similar, these words have different meanings and usage.

Food Born

The phrase "food born" is not a correct term in English. It may be a typographical error or a misconception. The word "born" is often used to refer to being brought into existence or the act of giving birth. When talking about food, this term does not make sense and is incorrect.

Example: "The restaurant served me some food which was food born." Incorrect


The correct term to use when referring to something related to food causing illness is "foodborne." The word "foodborne" is an adjective that describes an illness or disease that is caused by consuming contaminated food.

Example: "The foodborne illness that spread throughout the city was traced back to a local food processing plant."

Here, "foodborne" is used to explain that the illness is caused by the consumption of contaminated food.

In summary, it is important to use the correct term "foodborne" instead of "food born" when discussing illnesses caused by food contamination. Using the right term will ensure clear and effective communication.

It is always beneficial to use a grammar checker like Linguix Grammar Checker to avoid such common mistakes and enhance your writing skills.

food born vs foodborne mistake examples

  • Incorrect:
    He suffers a foodborn illness.

    He suffers a foodborne illness.

  • Incorrect:
    He suffers a food born illness.

    He suffers a foodborne illness.

Linguix Browser extension
Fix your writing
on millions of websites
Linguix pencil
This website uses cookies to make Linguix work for you. By using this site, you agree to our cookie policy