Who suffers the cost or damage
Use 'costly to' for the person, company, or group negatively affected.
'Costly to' and 'costly for' are both common but express different relationships. 'Costly in' is used for the area in which losses occur.
Use 'costly to' for the person or organisation affected by expense or damage. Use 'costly for' when something creates difficulty or expense for someone. Use 'costly in' when describing the area or resource where losses happen.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use 'costly to' for the person, company, or group negatively affected.
Use 'costly for' when discussing burden or expense in a broader situation.
Use 'costly in' to specify what is being lost, such as time, energy, or money.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Use 'costly to' for people or organisations that suffer losses.
✕ The mistake was costly in the company. ✓ The mistake was costly to the company.'Costly to' focuses on who suffers loss; 'costly for' often describes burden or difficulty.
✕ The change was costly to small businesses to manage. ✓ The change was costly for small businesses to manage.'Costly of' is not a standard combination.
✕ The delay was costly of the team. ✓ The delay was costly to the team.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Both are standard, but they express different relationships.
Yes. You can say something is 'costly in money, time, or effort'.
Yes. It means something creates expense or difficulty for you.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.