Corruption within a field or institution
Use 'corrupt in' to identify where corruption exists.
'Corrupt in' is used for areas of behaviour or systems. 'Corrupt to' is generally not a standard adjective pattern.
Use 'corrupt in' when referring to the area or activity where corruption exists. 'Corrupt to' is not normally used after the adjective 'corrupt'. English more often uses 'corrupt with', 'corrupt by', or an infinitive structure such as 'corrupt enough to'.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use 'corrupt in' to identify where corruption exists.
Use 'corrupt with' for moral or social corruption caused by something.
Use 'corrupt by' to identify the cause of corruption.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
'Corrupt to' is not normally an idiomatic adjective pattern.
✕ The officials were corrupt to the system. ✓ The officials were corrupt in the system.The verb 'corrupt' can take direct objects, but the adjective works differently.
✕ The manager was corrupt the process. ✓ The manager corrupted the process.Use 'by' or 'with' for causes and influences.
✕ He was corrupt in greed. ✓ He was corrupt by greed.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Not usually as a fixed adjective pattern. It may appear in phrases such as 'corrupt to the core', where 'to' belongs to a separate expression.
Yes. It means corruption exists within government.
Common patterns include 'corrupt in', 'corrupt by', and 'corrupt with', depending on meaning.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.