Showing severe harm to people or organisations
Use catastrophic for to describe something that causes extreme damage or failure.
Catastrophic is normally followed by for when describing harmful effects. Catastrophic to is uncommon after the adjective and is usually avoided.
The standard pattern is catastrophic for + person, group, system, or situation. Catastrophic to is generally not used after the adjective catastrophic, although to may appear separately as part of another phrase.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use catastrophic for to describe something that causes extreme damage or failure.
This pattern is common with economies, ecosystems, plans, and infrastructure.
Use catastrophic for when discussing outcomes or future development.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
English normally uses for after catastrophic when describing harmful effects.
✕ The decision was catastrophic to the company. ✓ The decision was catastrophic for the company.To may follow a related noun such as damage or loss.
✕ The fire was catastrophic to the museum. ✓ The fire caused catastrophic damage to the museum.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
It is unusual after the adjective catastrophic. In many cases, English uses catastrophic for instead.
Yes. For example, in catastrophic damage to the city, to belongs with damage, not with catastrophic.
People, businesses, systems, economies, plans, and future prospects commonly follow it.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.