Common mistake accused of a charge (charged with)
Common Mistake: Accused of a Charge
When writing about someone who has been charged with a crime, it is easy to make a common mistake and say they have been "accused of a charge." However, this phrase is redundant and can be easily corrected by using the more concise and accurate term "charged with."
Understanding the Mistake:
To understand why saying "accused of a charge" is incorrect, it's important to clarify the meaning of the words involved. Accused means to be charged with an offense or wrongdoing. A charge refers to a specific allegation or accusation against someone. Therefore, saying "accused of a charge" is essentially saying "charged with an allegation." It becomes repetitive and redundant.
The Correct Usage:
To avoid this mistake, it is recommended to use the phrase "charged with" when referring to someone who is accused of a crime. For example:
- Incorrect: He was accused of a charge of theft.
- Correct: He was charged with theft.
This concise and precise wording eliminates unnecessary repetition and conveys the intended meaning more effectively.
Why Choose Linguix Grammar Checker:
To ensure your writing is free from common grammar mistakes like the one discussed above, you can use the Linguix grammar checker. Linguix is an advanced tool that helps you identify and correct grammar errors, improve your writing style, and elevate your overall writing quality. It provides real-time suggestions, explanations, and examples to help you learn from your mistakes and become a better writer.
accused of a charge (charged with) mistake examples
-
Incorrect:The Magistrate's Court in Kuala Lumpur today decided that a former model accused of a charge of public indecency is fit to stand trial.Correct:The Magistrate's Court in Kuala Lumpur today decided that a former model charged with public indecency is fit to stand trial.