Both phrases are possible, but they are used differently. Of involvement usually describes a type or degree of involvement, while for involvement often shows a reason, purpose, or suitability.
Use of involvement to describe the nature, amount, or source of involvement. Use for involvement when talking about a reason, opportunity, or requirement connected to involvement.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Of involvement commonly follows nouns such as evidence, degree, level, or signs.
For involvement often explains why someone is rewarded, criticized, chosen, or known.
Involvement is most commonly followed by in when naming the activity or situation.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
After evidence, use of involvement, not for involvement.
✕ There was evidence for involvement. ✓ There was evidence of involvement.When naming an activity, involvement usually takes in.
✕ Her involvement the campaign was extensive. ✓ Her involvement in the campaign was extensive.Use for when giving a reason for recognition or selection.
✕ He was rewarded of involvement in the event. ✓ He was rewarded for involvement in the event.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
No. It is mainly used when giving a reason or purpose, such as praise or selection connected to involvement.
Involvement is very often followed by in when naming an activity, field, or situation.
Standard English normally uses evidence of involvement.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.
