Showing what is proved or observed
Use evidence of to identify the thing demonstrated by the evidence.
Evidence commonly combines with of, for, and in. Different prepositions express different relationships such as proof, support, or location.
Use evidence of to show what is proved, evidence for to support an idea or argument, and evidence in to describe where evidence appears. Evidence on usually means information about a topic. Evidence with is uncommon except when with introduces an accompanying detail.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use evidence of to identify the thing demonstrated by the evidence.
Use evidence for when evidence supports a belief, proposal, or explanation.
Use in to say where the evidence appears or is found.
Use on when evidence concerns a topic or issue.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Evidence of usually fits better when naming the condition or fact proved.
✕ There was evidence for water damage. ✓ There was evidence of water damage.With normally adds extra information rather than forming a standard combination with evidence.
✕ The report contained evidence with corruption. ✓ The report contained evidence of corruption.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Evidence of points to what is proved, while evidence for supports a theory or argument.
Yes. It is common when discussing a topic, such as evidence on education policy.
Usually not as a fixed phrase. With more often introduces an additional detail, not the main relationship.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.