Showing the target of harassment
Harass usually takes a direct object without a preposition.
Harass is usually a direct transitive verb, but some prepositions appear in specific contexts.
Harass is normally followed directly by an object: harass someone. Harass with is common for the method used. Harass for can show a reason. By, in, and at are usually separate adjuncts rather than fixed combinations with harass.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Harass usually takes a direct object without a preposition.
Use with to describe what is used to harass someone.
For can introduce the reason someone is targeted.
At is not selected by harass itself; it simply adds place information.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
Harass normally takes a direct object.
✕ They harassed at the tourists. ✓ They harassed the tourists.By usually introduces the agent in passive voice.
✕ They harassed by insults the player. ✓ They harassed the player with insults.At and in often describe where harassment happened, not a special construction.
✕ Harass at someone is illegal. ✓ Harassing someone at work is illegal.With introduces the method, not the person affected.
✕ They harassed with the new employee. ✓ They harassed the new employee.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
No. Harass normally takes a direct object, as in harass employees.
Yes. Harass with is common when describing the means used.
Both can show reason. Harassed for is shorter and more direct.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.