Naming the pollutant
With introduces the harmful material found in something.
With usually names the contaminating substance. By often names the source, process, or agent causing contamination.
Use contaminated with for the harmful material itself and contaminated by for the cause or source. The active verb contaminate also commonly takes a direct object.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
With introduces the harmful material found in something.
By introduces the agent or source responsible.
The verb often takes a direct object without a preposition.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
With is more natural when naming the material found in something.
✕ The water was contaminated by lead. ✓ The water was contaminated with lead.Contaminate can directly take an object.
✕ The chemicals contaminated with the soil. ✓ The chemicals contaminated the soil.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Yes. For example: The river was contaminated with mercury by mining operations.
Yes. Pollute is often broader and more common in everyday contexts.
Yes. It can be used figuratively, as in contaminated data.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.