Talking about lack of skill
Poor at describes weak ability in an activity or subject.
Poor combines with several prepositions, but each has a different meaning. Poor at and poor in are especially common.
Use poor at for lack of skill, poor in for lack of resources or qualities, poor for for suitability, and poor to mainly in expressions about treatment or attitude.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Poor at describes weak ability in an activity or subject.
Poor in means lacking something valuable or necessary.
Poor for means not suitable or beneficial for something.
Poor to can describe unkind or unfair treatment, though bad to is more common in everyday English.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
English uses poor in to show lack of resources or qualities.
✕ The area is poor of water. ✓ The area is poor in water.Poor at is for skill; poor in is for resources or qualities.
✕ She is poor in tennis. ✓ She is poor at tennis.Poor for usually refers to suitability, not behaviour toward people.
✕ He was poor for his children. ✓ He was poor to his children.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Poor at refers to skill, while poor in refers to lacking resources or qualities.
No. Current English normally uses poor in instead.
Yes, but bad to someone is more common in everyday English.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.