Who can clearly understand something
Use to with the person or group that notices or understands.
Different prepositions after obvious express who understands something, what evidence shows it, or where it appears.
Use obvious to for the person who can understand or notice something. Use obvious from for evidence or source. Use obvious in for the place, behaviour, or text where something is clearly seen.
These forms are not interchangeable. Choose the construction by meaning, not by which preposition appears most often.
Use to with the person or group that notices or understands.
Use from with signs, behaviour, data, or other evidence.
Use in for speech, writing, behaviour, or environments where something appears.
The same subject can take different constructions because each sentence answers a different question.
Some combinations appear in real text but do not mean what learners often assume.
To names the observer, not the evidence.
✕ It was obvious to the report that profits fell. ✓ It was obvious from the report that profits fell.From introduces evidence, not the observer.
✕ The answer was obvious from the students. ✓ The answer was obvious to the students.In shows where something appears; to shows who notices it.
✕ Her anger was obvious to her voice. ✓ Her anger was obvious in her voice.Choose the expression that matches the intended meaning.
Paste the complete sentence below. Linguix checks the preposition together with grammar, spelling, punctuation, and style.
Obvious to refers to the observer. Obvious from refers to the evidence.
Yes. It is used for places, behaviour, writing, and other contexts where something appears clearly.
No. Obvious about can mean openly showing something, which is a different structure and meaning.
Create a free account to check complete texts, apply suggestions, and save your documents.